<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rotating with CSS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simonjobling.com/blog/2008/rotating-with-css/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simonjobling.com/blog/2008/rotating-with-css/</link>
	<description>also known as One Phat DJ</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Suzann Olejarz</title>
		<link>http://simonjobling.com/blog/2008/rotating-with-css/comment-page-1/#comment-189416</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzann Olejarz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 13:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonjobling.com/?p=562#comment-189416</guid>
		<description>When I design a sight I design first and code second. I find that using pure CSS layout , like an obnoxious backseat driver, often ends up stearing the design a little bit in the end. This is most often a problem when floating elements inside a centered div - the darn footer elements colapse upwards; don't float use positining and margins? Crossbrowser catastrophe! Usually one simple table takes care of so many things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I design a sight I design first and code second. I find that using pure CSS layout , like an obnoxious backseat driver, often ends up stearing the design a little bit in the end. This is most often a problem when floating elements inside a centered div - the darn footer elements colapse upwards; don&#8217;t float use positining and margins? Crossbrowser catastrophe! Usually one simple table takes care of so many things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rotating with CSS - Si Jobling &#124; CSS Tutorials - CSSHelper.net</title>
		<link>http://simonjobling.com/blog/2008/rotating-with-css/comment-page-1/#comment-165872</link>
		<dc:creator>Rotating with CSS - Si Jobling &#124; CSS Tutorials - CSSHelper.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonjobling.com/?p=562#comment-165872</guid>
		<description>[...] Source [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QA</title>
		<link>http://simonjobling.com/blog/2008/rotating-with-css/comment-page-1/#comment-164661</link>
		<dc:creator>QA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonjobling.com/?p=562#comment-164661</guid>
		<description>I am always bewildered at how many years it takes the almighty decision-makers to implement such simple things as rotation of images and text. 

Or maybe it just takes time for everyone to agree. I can imagine the Microsoft people and the Mozilla people etc gathered around a big table arguing like: "rotation would be useful", "No! Rotation is blasphemy! Give them rotation and next they'll ask for drop-shadows!" "Drop shadows would be great too!" "To hell with your drop-shadows" "Well we're going to support it!" "Go right ahead, see what I care!"...

From a designer's standpoint it's frustrating when you're used to being able to do just about anything in a program like Photoshop and then you try to translate your design to the web and all hell breaks loose. It's one reason I abandoned interest in web design for many years. 

In the end you often have to choose between making something interesting and making something safe. I say all developers/designers boycott all the non-Firefox browsers just so we can all get on the same bloody page! (Excuse the pun)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am always bewildered at how many years it takes the almighty decision-makers to implement such simple things as rotation of images and text. </p>
<p>Or maybe it just takes time for everyone to agree. I can imagine the Microsoft people and the Mozilla people etc gathered around a big table arguing like: &#8220;rotation would be useful&#8221;, &#8220;No! Rotation is blasphemy! Give them rotation and next they&#8217;ll ask for drop-shadows!&#8221; &#8220;Drop shadows would be great too!&#8221; &#8220;To hell with your drop-shadows&#8221; &#8220;Well we&#8217;re going to support it!&#8221; &#8220;Go right ahead, see what I care!&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>From a designer&#8217;s standpoint it&#8217;s frustrating when you&#8217;re used to being able to do just about anything in a program like Photoshop and then you try to translate your design to the web and all hell breaks loose. It&#8217;s one reason I abandoned interest in web design for many years. </p>
<p>In the end you often have to choose between making something interesting and making something safe. I say all developers/designers boycott all the non-Firefox browsers just so we can all get on the same bloody page! (Excuse the pun)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
